Category Review

Sort Publications By:


Journal Articles

Towards a more dynamic understanding of human behaviour in the Anthropocene

Schill, C., J.M. Anderies, T. Lindahl, C. Folke, S. Polasky, J.C. Cárdenas, A.-S. Crépin, M.A. Janssen, J. Norberg, and M. Schlüter

2019 Nature Sustainability. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0419-7.

 Abstract

Human behaviour is of profound significance in shaping pathways towards sustainability. Yet, the approach to understanding human behaviour in many fields remains reliant on overly simplistic models. For a better understanding of the interface between human behaviour and sustainability, we take work in behavioural economics and cognitive psychology as a starting point, but argue for an expansion of this work by adopting a more dynamic and systemic understanding of human behaviour, that is, as part of complex adaptive systems. A complex adaptive systems approach allows us to capture behaviour as ‘enculturated’ and ‘enearthed’, co-evolving with socio–cultural and biophysical contexts. Connecting human behaviour and context through a complex adaptive systems lens is critical to inform environmental governance and management for sustainability, and ultimately to better understand the dynamics of the Anthropocene itself.


 

A framework for mapping and comparing behavioral theories in models of social-ecological systems

Schlüter, M., A. Baeza, G. Dressler, K. Frank, J. Groeneveld, W. Jager, M.A. Janssen, R. McAllister, B. Müller, K. Orach, N. Schwarz, N. Wijermans

2017 Ecological Economics 131: 21-35.

 Abstract

Formal models are commonly used in natural resource management (NRM) to study human-environment interactions and inform policy making. In the majority of applications, human behaviour is represented by the rational actor model despite growing empirical evidence of its shortcomings in NRM contexts. While the importance of accounting for the complexity of human behaviour is increasingly recognized, its integration into formal models remains a major challenge. The challenges are multiple: i) there exist many theories scattered across the social sciences, ii) most theories cover only a certain aspect of decision-making, iii) they vary in their degree of formalization, iv) causal mechanisms are often not specified. We provide a framework- MoHuB (Modelling Human Behavior) – to facilitate a broader inclusion of theories on human decision-making in formal NRM models. It serves as a tool and common language to describe, compare and communicate alternative theories. In doing so, we not only enhance understanding of commonalities and differences between theories, but take a first step towards tackling the challenges mentioned above. This approach may enable modellers to find and formalize relevant theories, and be more explicit and inclusive about theories of human decision making in the analysis of social-ecological systems.


 


Book Chapters
 

Cultural Evolution of the Structure of Human Groups

Jordan, F.M., C. van Schaik, P. François, H. Gintis, D.B.M. Haun, D.J. Hruschka, M.A. Janssen, J.A. Kitts, L. Lehmann, S. Mathew, P.J. Richerson, P. Turchin, and P. Wiessner

2013 In Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion, edited by P.J. Richerson and M.H. Christiansen, pp. 87-116, MIT Press.

Sort Publications: